What is Radical Mycology? This simple question is one of the most common that I’ve received over the last twenty years, and the one that long remained among the most difficult for me to address. This was not because I didn’t know what the term meant to me. Rather, I didn’t know what it meant for the countless people engaged in its defining.
During the initial years following the release of the Radical Mycology zine, the feedback I received from the text constantly expanded my perception of what an unconventional approach to mycology could look like. It was an exciting time, where nearly every conversation I had about fungi offered new points of inspiration. The more alternative mycologists that I met, the more I realized how deep the mycelium traveled, and how vast was the unexplored terrain of its inquiry. In short time, I came to the conclusion that the best way to advance mycology was to invite more voices to its philosophical round table to imagine – together – where fungi could lead us.
Recognizing how nascent the conversation was, I resisted summarizing its semi-formed state. Talking points felt counter-productive to exploring an barely-understood science. So for years I would reply to that simple, difficult question by asking what the term meant for the inquirer – with each inspiring reply assuring me that Radical Mycology could not be a prescribed. Rather it was best presented then as a means toward seeing fungi and working them from a place of respect.
Establishing Threads
For better or worse, the RM definition conversation thus remained open-ended for years. In time, though, this void caused those not involved in the effort to superimpose descriptions that were far from the ethos I had advocated since the first Radical Mycology Convergence (RMC). Assumptions that “radical” implied using psychoactive fungi or adhering to explicit political motivations became increasing murmured by outsiders – assumptions that detracted from the core aim of nurturing a community of people who want to form reciprocal relationships with fungi.
The initial RMC approached this intent by revolving around the practical benefits of applied mycology. Since then, consideration of mycological influences on the humanities, psychology, and semiotics has come to take equal attention in the Radical Mycology movement due to the deep impact that these disciplines have on the long-term functioning and structuring of societies. Our work has never been driven to antagonize the status quo. Radical Mycology is a way of being that is for the fungi – a sentiment that is slowed by a respect for nature’s wisdom, drawn from a desire to share mycology holistically, and attendant to the human condition that strides alongside all acts.
With the gap between the intention and reception of our work growing, I offered the first definition of “Radical Mycology” in the Preface to the book Radical Mycology (2016) as:
- A social philosophy that describes cultural phenomena through a framework inspired by the unique qualities of fungal biology and ecology.
- A mycocentric analysis of ecological relationships.
- A grassroots movement that produces and distributes accessible mycological and fungal cultivation information to enhance the resilience of humans, their societies, and the environments they touch.
Intentionally brief, I hoped then that these terms provided enough context to offset common points of confusion, while still allowing space for readers to develop their own relationship with the phrase as they worked through the text. Sure enough, over the proceeding years the Radical Mycology community greatly expanded its discourse in response to the book’s contents– so much so that these original definitions now reflect only a small portion of the paradigms most commonly held by Radical Mycologists.